h1

Understanding Time: About Spirits and Apparitions

December 14, 2010

Spirits, ghosts, apparitions whatever you call them, is a part of our daily staple for thought. There are various theories about them ranging from hallucination to them being ectoplasmic beings. However, not many have considered an alternative approach –  approach based on dimensional theory. If you remember my last post, you will remember my theory about space being a 2-D entity with universe as structures within the same. Now let us take it a bit further. Any structure whether 2-D or 3-D cannot stop itself from vibrating. In other words, none of the structure, irrespective of shape and size, can be still If there is vibration, that means there is frequency associated with that structure.

Having different frequencies can enable different structures to occupy same spot. This means at a given point in space there can exist, multiple universes without knowing existence of each-other. Now, for a small duration if any two of them approach same frequency, they will become apparent to each other. Even though, they may pass through each other due to difference in frequency. At such an instant, the organisms (like us) will see the reflection or a hazy image of the organisms of the other structure. These hazy image, depending upon the neighborhood of the approaching frequency, may interact with our universe. To be precise, my theory is stated thus “When universes occupy same plane at different frequencies, due to unknown reason or reasons, approach a frequency that is in the neighborhood of the natural frequency of the universes, the organisms of each universe sees an image of the other The spirits and apparitions are these images “. In nutshell, ghosts are living being of other universes which interact with our universe at one or other point in time With this I wrap up my post Awaiting your comments and thoughts.

h1

Understanding Time: The Fourth Dimension -II

December 13, 2010

The structure discussed in previous post is one of the many approaches towards visualizing 4th Dimension. It may be or it may not be. The reason is that there is no way to prove it. However, it can clarify the change in everything, including our body. Hence, visualization of time is possible to an extent. It also proves that as such the three dimensions are inert. The time brings about change and different structures are formed.

This leads us to the next level of our quest. It is beyond doubt that space is basically founded on intermingled dimensions. But what about its situation? I mean to say “Is space an independent unit or is it a constituent of some super-dimensional ultra-spatial structure?” By physics there are five basic dimensions – Length, Breadth, Height represented by Length. Apart from it Mass and Time are the other two. So all in all five dimensions Length, Mass and Time are the building blocks. All other dimensions are supplementary. But they are not beyond space. Hence, one can conclude that space is the ultimate super or ultra structure. This conclusion is accepted by almost all. All the theories about origin and fate of the universe is based on the assumption that space is all containing. Even parallel and alternate universes are also believed to be parts of this space. Yet one nagging query remains. At the time of Big Bang all the space was packed into singularity So where was the singularity enthroned? With this question I am wrapping up this post.

h1

Understanding Time: The Fourth Dimension – I

December 13, 2010

Once the generalized view of Past, Present and Future has been discarded, the same question arises again What is time? Why is it so difficult to understand it? In my opinion the main hurdle is the inability to visualize the 4th Dimension w r t other three dimensions. The effect of time on matter is slow and gradual If space is considered for visualization, we can create a model or assume its shape. But how about time? There can be a possible answer i e space is completely surrounded by time just as globe is surrounded by space. If this is the case, it will be difficult to establish time’s existence.  This brings us to the next step of questioning What is the relationship between space and time? Space is a three-dimensional specimen Hence space is dependent on dimensions. By this we can say that change in any dimension could change the structure of the space Suppose, three dimensions form a space having structure of a cube  Fig a Fig b Fig c
Let Fig a be the reference space If any of the dimension’s distance from the origin is changed, or the direction of the orientation is changed, structure of space also changes. Now take a pt and join it to the origin. Taking this as a new dimension construct a structure(Fig c) resulting in a four-dimensional structure which demolishes its reference structure (Fig a) in its totality. If this 4th dimension is capable of manoeuvering the orientation, distance etc of other dimensions, we get an ever-changing space This 4th dimension is Time.

h1

Understanding Time: Implications

December 13, 2010

In the last post I stopped at Paradox. The term Paradox is another head of the Hydra of questions that time and its related aspects presents to anyone who tries to understand it. So what does paradox really mean? Is it a theoretical ‘being’ or does it have a practical bearing? Dictionary meaning states that Paradox is a statement that seems contradictory but is really true. That means all the paradoxes that a person confronts (O K only in books) are true. But science stops anyone from believing anything unless it is experimentally proved. This implies that all theories concerning time  (I am also generalizing as every theorist does) are more or less unfounded. Because, as I said earlier, one cannot trite the validity of a theory about any component of a system from within the system. By this the only conclusion that I can come is whatever theorems have been formed about time (I am leaving gravity out of it for the time being) are faux passé. The best example is the theory that Speeds greater than speed of Light is impossible to achieve The theorists prove it using E=mc^2. If speed approaches speed of light i e c, then m will approach infinity. Thus making ‘faster than light’ travel seemingly impossible. However, here the assumption is c is constant What if it is not? So due to these theorems I say that time based theorems are faux passé.   This may seem radical and cruel but true Everything is based on an assembly of un-architectured structure.

However, I feel everything is not lost. Some of the bricks of the foundation are in their correct position. The task is daunting. Even then one cant quit trying. The tools in accomplishing this task is logic, capacitance of observation and perseverance I think this is a perfect conclusion for an imperfect introduction.

h1

Understanding Time: More Questions

December 13, 2010

Starting of where I left off in the last to last post, by taking time as surrounding and universe as a system, the hypothesis of time suspension could be explained as “A phenomenon-product of system being isolated from surrounding by an intermittent force – the force being gravity”. But to prove this, the observation point needed is located outside the universe, reason being inability to deduce the pattern of kaleidoscope by observing it only from inside. This rule is applicable to all theories ranging from origin of the universe to ‘semi planetary placinra’. The vastness (not infinity) of space causes the problem in finding such observation points.

Coming back to our main problem of origin of gravity. However, this question need to be kept in back-burner for the time being as facts need to be processed. So I am moving onto next question It is a known fact that time brings about changes. These changes transform energy from one form to another. As I said before time and gravity are interlinked. So, change in one should not only affect the other but also there should be interchange of energies resulting in changes that will affect any dimension. That means if work is done against gravity why no change in dimension was not recorded? Even if such a change was recorded there is no agreement on the reason of change. So, what really happens to the body moving against gravity say with Mach-2 speed? The energy i.e. KE and PE gets stored and inter-converted. But don’t these energies cause any change in its basic dimensions? If so, then satellites should have some change, however small must have been there. Since, time is also a dimension, so there should be a time interchange or by complexity a Paradox With this dangler I am signing off this post.

h1

Understanding Time: Of God and Souls

December 13, 2010

From my childhood I have heard a saying which roughly translates to “God’s form is time“. What does this essentially mean? Does this mean God is above and beyond time? Or does it mean that God is Time and Time is God? Let me take it on-by-one. If we suppose (not assume) that first one to be true i e God is above and beyond time, theen may of the powers of God can be understood. For instance, if God is beyond time, then everything will be like a frame-by-frame display to God who can become any part of any frame. So past, present and future will be literally out of the picture.

If the second one is taken to be true, then that means there is no difference between God and Time. Then omnipotence, omniscience and omnipresence of God are unquestionable. However, this brings another ‘power’ into focus. That is Energy The only component of this universe that is omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent – just like God So can it be that Energy is God And the different forms are the forms taken by God on different occasions?

If God is Energy itself, then what does that tells us about Soul? Atma (Soul) is considered part of Paramatma (God) When Soul merges with God, then Moksha or Libration is attained. In the case of God being Energy, then Soul is a form of Energy. And death is nothing but the form of Energy (Soul) leaving the body Birth is Energy taking a different form. This can also imply that “All is one and One is All” is correct because everyone is one or other form of energy With this I sign off this post.

NB: The post is result of my discussion with one of my friends.   This was only an attempt at a different  look at the aspects of God and Soul.

h1

Understanding Time: Blockades

December 13, 2010

Starting from where I left off yesterday, any attempt to answer the question about origin of gravity hits a logical blockade It is a known factor that without matter gravity cannot exist as “Gravity is the force with which a matter or particle attracts another particle provided both are not intermittent by other particles or anti-particles” If we take this statement as base, then gravity was non-existent before Big-Bang Then what was it that brought the substance (was it composed of particles?) of the pre-universe era, together to form dense matter? If answer to these question can be found then I am certain many a headaches can be cured But where to look for an answer? Our Milky Way, of course, or nearer, our Earth The force experienced by all must have an origin here itself Or is it possible that Earth is an inconsiderable unit of a super-system which have gravity as its surrounding and of which time is a forward-backward biased catalyst? There is also a possibility of being other way round i e universe-the system, time – the surrounding and gravity being the conductor of reactive input and effective output? If it is so then various phenomenon including different stages of universe can be explained with respect to properties intrinsic to gravity With this partial conclusion I am signing off Keep visiting for more

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.